A purported audio recording allegedly involving the Officer-in-Charge (OC) of Kalmakanda Police Station in Netrokona has sparked widespread debate and controversy after circulating on social media.
The approximately four-minute-and-four-second recording began circulating on Saturday evening and quickly gained traction across various online platforms. In the audio, a voice alleged to be that of OC Md. Abul Hashem, the incumbent officer at Netrokona’s Kalmakanda Police Station, is heard addressing subordinate members of the police force.
Within the recording, the speaker is accused of describing policing duties in terms that critics have interpreted as referring to police work as a form of “business”. The voice further appears to discuss the handling of money allegedly collected through routine police activities and calls for coordinated distribution among personnel. At the same time, the speaker is also heard emphasising that subordinates should not be deprived of their due share and stressing the importance of maintaining discipline and integrity in official duties.
Following the circulation of the audio, it triggered immediate public backlash on social media. Many commentators described the remarks as inconsistent with professional ethics and the principles of public service, raising concerns about discipline and accountability within the police administration.
In response to the growing controversy, district police authorities moved swiftly. Netrokona Superintendent of Police Md. Tariqul Islam confirmed that OC Md. Abul Hashem has been withdrawn from his post pending investigation. A three-member inquiry committee has also been formed to examine the authenticity, context, and origin of the recording. The committee has been instructed to submit its findings within five working days, after which appropriate departmental action will be determined based on the report.
However, OC Md. Abul Hashem has denied the allegations, stating that he did not make such statements. He further claimed that he is unaware of the origin of the audio and expressed surprise after it began circulating online.
The incident has prompted wider discussion about internal discipline within law enforcement agencies and the importance of maintaining public trust. While some members of the public have welcomed the swift administrative response, others have called for a thorough, impartial, and transparent investigation to ensure that the facts are properly established.
Timeline of Key Developments
| Time / Phase | Event |
|---|---|
| Saturday evening | A 4-minute 4-second audio clip begins circulating on social media |
| Shortly after | Widespread criticism emerges online |
| Following morning | OC Md. Abul Hashem is withdrawn from duty |
| Same period | A three-member investigation committee is formed |
| Within five working days | Committee instructed to submit its report |
Police officials have reiterated that any conduct or statement undermining the integrity of the force will not be tolerated. The case remains under active review, with further action contingent on the outcome of the investigation.