Global crude oil prices have risen following remarks by United States President Donald Trump, who described Iran’s response to a US ceasefire proposal as “completely unacceptable”. The comments, made on social media, came after Tehran’s reply—delivered via Pakistan as an intermediary—was reported by Iranian semi-official news agency Tasnim and cited by the BBC.
According to the report, Iran conveyed its response to Washington through Pakistan, acting as a mediator. In its message, Tehran called for an immediate end to hostilities and sought assurances that there would be no further attacks by the United States or Israel. The US proposal reportedly included provisions for restoring safe navigation in the Strait of Hormuz and suspending Iran’s uranium enrichment activities.
Following Trump’s rejection of the response, oil markets reacted sharply during Asian trading on Monday morning, reflecting ongoing concerns over supply disruptions in the region.
Table of Contents
Oil price movement
| Benchmark | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Brent Crude | +3.8% | $105.20 per barrel |
| WTI Crude | +4.0% | $99.30 per barrel |
Market volatility has been sustained since the outbreak of conflict on 28 February, during which the Strait of Hormuz has been effectively disrupted. The waterway is a critical global energy corridor, through which approximately one-fifth of the world’s oil and gas shipments normally pass.
The reported instability has contributed to persistent upward pressure on global energy prices. Since the escalation, shipping through the Strait has been severely constrained, with warnings of potential attacks on vessels following strikes by the United States and Israel.
Political and diplomatic developments
Trump stated on social media that Iran’s reply was reviewed and deemed unacceptable, intensifying uncertainty surrounding ongoing diplomatic efforts. The US had previously extended a ceasefire arrangement on 21 April, allowing additional time for what it described as a “coordinated proposal” to be considered.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also maintained that the conflict cannot conclude unless Iran’s enriched uranium stockpiles are rendered “inoperative”, underscoring continued disagreements over Iran’s nuclear programme.
Despite intermittent clashes, a ceasefire framework introduced in early April has largely held, though it remains fragile.
Energy markets and corporate impact
The disruption in Middle Eastern supply routes has had mixed effects on global energy producers. Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil company Saudi Aramco reported that its net income for the first quarter of the year rose by more than 25 per cent compared with the same period in the previous year.
Aramco’s chief executive noted that the company’s extensive domestic pipeline infrastructure has helped maintain export flows despite shipping constraints linked to regional instability.
Similarly, major international energy firms have reported stronger financial performance. BP stated that its quarterly profit more than doubled year-on-year, while Shell also announced increased earnings in its most recent reporting period.
United States position in global oil trade
The disruption in Middle Eastern supply routes has coincided with a significant shift in the United States’ energy trade position. The country is now a net exporter of oil, a notable change from its position prior to 2014, when it was largely dependent on imports.
Including both crude and refined products, US exports have reached approximately 14 million barrels per day. A key driver of this increase has been rising diesel exports to Europe, reflecting changing global demand patterns and supply chain realignments.
Overall, the latest developments highlight continued volatility in global energy markets, closely tied to geopolitical tensions and uncertainty over the future of regional maritime security.