Serious allegations have emerged from prominent economist Anu Muhammad, who has claimed that several individuals within the recently departed administration led by Muhammad Yunus acted as covert lobbyists for foreign corporations. In a recent media interview, Professor Muhammad suggested that certain advisers and special assistants operated under the guise of public service while, in effect, promoting external commercial interests.
According to him, the behaviour and policy advocacy of these individuals raise legitimate concerns about whose interests were being prioritised during their tenure. Although he refrained from naming specific persons, his remarks have ignited debate over transparency, accountability, and the potential influence of foreign entities in Bangladesh’s strategic decision-making processes.
A focal point of his criticism centres on the strategic importance of Port of Chittagong, the country’s principal maritime gateway. The port handles approximately 90 per cent of Bangladesh’s total import and export activities, making it a cornerstone of the national economy. Professor Muhammad warned that transferring control or operational authority of such a critical facility to foreign companies could effectively place the country’s entire international trade infrastructure under external influence.
He further argued that while some nations operate multiple ports and may allocate limited operational roles to foreign firms, Bangladesh’s heavy reliance on a single dominant port makes such decisions far more consequential. “Handing over key segments of port operations,” he implied, “could compromise both economic sovereignty and long-term national interests.”
Particular attention was also given to the New Mooring Container Terminal, which he described as an emerging example of domestic operational capability. Over the past six months, the terminal has reportedly been managed by the Bangladesh Navy, during which time efficiency has improved and wastage has declined. Professor Muhammad suggested that this progress demonstrated the viability of strengthening local management rather than outsourcing to foreign entities.
Below is a summary of the key issues raised:
| Key Aspect | Details | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Main Allegation | Advisers allegedly acted as foreign lobbyists | Raises governance and ethical concerns |
| Strategic Asset | Port of Chittagong handles ~90% trade | Central to national economy |
| Operational Debate | Foreign vs local management | Impacts sovereignty and efficiency |
| Case Example | New Mooring Terminal under Navy | Improved performance reported |
| Potential Risk | External influence over trade infrastructure | Long-term economic implications |
Analysts note that such allegations, if substantiated, could have far-reaching consequences for public trust and policy formulation. They also highlight the need for stricter vetting processes in appointing advisers and clearer safeguards against conflicts of interest.
As of now, no official response has been issued by representatives of the former administration. Nevertheless, the claims have stirred public discourse, with many calling for greater scrutiny of decision-making processes involving national assets.