Substantial inconsistencies have been identified between the financial declarations of Sarjis Alam, the 27-year-old candidate of the National Citizens’ Party (NCP) for the Panchagarh-1 constituency. The discrepancies were observed in the documents submitted to the Election Commission (EC), raising serious questions about the accuracy of his reported income and assets.
Sarjis Alam has declared his profession as a businessman. However, a comparison of his affidavit with his income tax return reveals a striking gap in the figures provided. According to the affidavit, he reported an annual business income of BDT 900,000. Contrastingly, his income tax return for the fiscal year 2025–26 shows an income of BDT 2,805,000, almost three times higher than the affidavit claim.
Similar discrepancies are evident in his declared assets. While the affidavit lists total movable and immovable assets of BDT 561,000, his income tax return cites assets worth BDT 3,373,000—an increase of more than BDT 2.8 million.
The comparison is detailed in the table below:
| Type of Information | Affidavit (BDT) | Income Tax Return (BDT) | Difference (BDT) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual Income | 900,000 | 2,805,000 | 1,905,000 |
| Total Assets | 561,000 | 3,373,000 | 2,812,000 |
| Movable Assets | 561,000 | – | – |
| Cash | 311,000 | – | – |
| Bank Accounts | 100,000 | – | – |
| Electronics & Furniture | 150,000 | – | – |
| Immovable Assets (Agricultural Land) | 500,000 | – | – |
In addition to these, the electoral expenditure details indicate that Sarjis Alam expects gifts totalling BDT 1.1 million from four well-wishers and has reportedly taken a loan of BDT 200,000 from another individual. Further gifts from his in-laws and other relatives are also mentioned, although the exact amounts are unclear due to illegible entries; it is assumed each contribution was at least BDT 100,000. Additionally, he has received a loan of BDT 100,000 from his brother-in-law.
The records further indicate that Sarjis Alam paid BDT 52,500 in income tax for the 2025–26 fiscal year. He is also reportedly involved in a criminal case in Gazipur.
The stark inconsistencies between the affidavit and tax return have prompted concerns over transparency and the accuracy of candidates’ financial disclosures. Election authorities are closely reviewing the case, considering it a critical matter in ensuring electoral integrity and public trust.